One of our convictional principles for reading the Bible is called “Text and Framework”, a principle that teaches,
“We must let the Bible shape our frameworks rather than letting our frameworks shape our interpretations of the Bible.”
Business Insider recently published an article called “20 cognitive biases that screw up your decisions“, describing information that quickly becomes cognitive biases, or when applied to reading the Bible, unhelpful frameworks that can prevent us from seeing the text of Scripture as we ought.
The list below gives a summary of the 20 frameworks. [Or view the full graphic.]
How many of them affect your Bible reading?
1. Anchoring bias. People are over-reliant on the first piece of information they hear.
2. Availability heuristic. People overestimate the importance of information that is available to them.
3. Bandwagon effect. The probability of one person adopting a belief increases based on the number of people who hold that belief.
4. Blind-spot bias. Failing to recognize your own cognitive biases is a bias in itself.
5. Choice-supportive bias. When you choose something, you tend to feel positive about it, even if that choice has flaws.
6. Clustering illusion. This is the tendency to see patterns in random events.
7. Confirmation bias. We tend to listen only to information that confirms our preconceptions.
8. Conservatism bias. When people favor prior evidence over new evidence or information that has emerged.
9. Information bias. The tendency to seek information when it does not affect action.
10. Ostrich effect. The decision to ignore dangerous or negative information by “burying” one’s head in the sand, like an ostrich.
11. Outcome bias. Judging a decision based on the outcome—rather than how exactly the decision was made in the moment.
12. Overconfidence. Some of us are too confident about our abilities, and this causes us to take greater risks in our daily lives.
13. Placebo effect. When simply believing that something will have a certain effect on you causes it to have that effect.
14. Pro-innovation bias. When a proponent of an innovation tends to overvalue its usefulness and undervalue its limitations.
15. Recency. The tendency to weigh the latest information more heavily than older data.
16. Salience. Our tendency to focus on the most easily recognizable features of a person or concept.
17. Selective perception. Allowing our expectations to influence how we perceive the world.
18. Stereotyping. Expecting a group or person to have certain qualities without having real information about the person.
19. Survivorship bias. An error that comes from focusing only on surviving examples, causing us to misjudge a situation.
20. Zero-risk bias. Sociologists have found that we love certainty—even if it’s counterproductive.
Once known as “pygmies,” which means small-stature hunter-gatherers of the equatorial forests, the Batwa are believed to be among the…Read more
Harold Haamumba is a training partner and the national coordinator for WordPartners training in Zambia and in Malawi. He works…Read more
Alexander was sitting with a group of pastors in a nearby Russian city ready to learn from the Russian Bible…Read more
Shaped by God’s Word during times of uncertainty Editor’s note: The story below was written before the crisis in Ukraine…Read more
The board of directors is pleased to announce that it has named David Sunday as the third president of WordPartners. …Read more